Listed, thinner proof

Copenhagen Private Clinic

Frederiksberg, Denmark

Maca

5 composite score 22 reviews · 1 platform low confidence

Copenhagen Private Clinic is a hair-transplant clinic on our list in Frederiksberg, led by Maca. Indicative pricing: 28,000 DKK. Cross-checked against 3 independent sources; ratings below are shown per platform, unblended.

You can't pay to be listed here 3 independent sources Honest negatives kept, not hidden

5 Google 22 reviews

Surgeon & safety signals

What Reddit and forum users actually argue about: who does the work, and whether it's a "hair mill". We state only what's verified; the rest is honestly marked not disclosed.

Hair-mill riskNot enough data

ISHRS / authority memberNot confirmed

Years in hair restoration18+ yrs

Named surgeonYes

Doctor performs incisionsNot disclosed

Doctor performs extractionNot disclosed

Surgeon involvementNot disclosed

Technician involvementNot disclosed

Procedures per dayNot disclosed

Revision rateNot disclosed

Surgeon

Maca

Lead practitioner/therapist for hair transplantation since 2008; only a first name is published, described as therapist — NO MD/surgeon credential stated.

Pricing

28,000 DKK (800-1200 grafts) to 55,000 DKK (2800-3500 grafts) · source: copenhagenprivateclinic.com prices page

Contact

Website	copenhagenprivateclinic.com/
Phone	+45 22 22 15 44
Email	[email protected]
Google Maps	View on Maps
Accreditations	Registered with Danish Patient Safety Authority (Autorisationsregister), CVR 44508508

Notable

DHI-based FUE with implanter pen; practitioner tenure claimed since 2008 — but no named physician.

Sources & verification

Last verified 2026-07-12 · placed by verification, never by payment.

Editorial note: Kept at tier 3 (thin). A Trustpilot page exists (independent) plus a Danish comparison-site listing, but the only named principal is a first name ('Maca') described as a therapist, not a physician — weak/anonymous principal signal, verified=false. DHI-based FUE with a 90%+ success 'guarantee' (marketing claim). Borderline on the exclusion rule; retained as tier 3 with the weak-principal caveat rather than presented as trustworthy. Email published on site.